Said’s idea on Orientalism:
Before discussing Orientalism, it is necessary to know about
Edward Said. So let’s have a look on Edward said in detail.
About Author:
Edward Said is one of the most shining stars of the
postcolonial literature. He was a Palestinian American literary theorist and
public intellectual who had found the difficult theory and field of post colonialism.
Edward said is known mainly for his contribution to postcolonial studies on the
topic of Orientalism-this being a consideration of the many different stereotypes
that are present in the representation and understanding of the many Asian
communities.
Edward Said has multiple critics. Porter concedes that
Edward Said’s text has value, in so far as it examines the relationship between
manifest Orientalism and its latent, originating ideas about the orient, rather
than trying to consolidate the based perception of Orientalism with historical
and biological facts. However he notes that it contains a fundamental
contradiction in its basic structure.
Now let’s elaborate what is Orientalism in detail.
What is Orientalism?
“Orientalism is a way of seeing that imagines,
emphasizes exaggerates and distorts differences of Arab people and culture as
compared to that of Europe and the U.S.It often involves seeing Arab culture as
exotic,backward,uncivilized and at times dangerous”
According to Edward
Said:
“Orientalism is the acceptance in the west of
the basic distinction between east and west as the starting point for elaborate
theories, epics, novels, social descriptions, and political accounts concerning
the orient, its people, customs, mind and so on”
According to Edward Said, Orientalism dates from the period
of European enlightenment and Colonization of the Arab World. Example of early
Orientalism can be seen in European paintings and photographs in the U.S in the
19th and 20th centuries.
Edward Said starts by asserting the fact that orient played
an instrumental role in the construction of the European culture as the
powerful of other. The orient has helped to define Europe as its contrasting
image, idea, personality experience.
He then states that this Orientalism can
be understood in combined representation of the orient in the western culture,
science, politics etc. and transcending the borders of all this field of
knowledge and it becomes a style of thought based upon an ontological and
epistemological distinction made between The Orient and the Occident.
Moreover, it transforms in to a powerful political
instrument of domination.
“Orientalism as a western style for dominating,
restructuring and having authority over other nation”
As Edward Said is a Marxist, there is no wonder that it is
third incarnation of the Orientalism and domination. In the Foucautian
tradition, Edward Said suggests to look at Orientalism as a discourse.
Even today oriental countries have the same perspectives
that they had earlier. They even today see any oriental country as a developing
country. They believe that they are ahead in the world and we are
underdeveloped people.
So, here Edward Said puts forward his ideas about
Orientalism and later on he asks several questions as given below
Ø How do we look at east?
Ø How do the European countries look at east?
Ø How do they look at west?
So, these questions can be studied in a broader way. Edward
Said then states that the western image of the orient and Orientalism had
little to do with the real orient.
Orientalism is not simply the work of European imagination
but it is all about power, domination, hegemony and authority. Orientalism is
not a mere political subject matter or field that is reflected passively by
culture.
Further Edward Said tells that we always look at our country
as we are lacking those powers and reputation that the western countries
possess. Edward Said starts by analyzing that public speeches and writing of
two British imperialist of the 20th century about the Egypt, making
an emphasis on how the stress that since the British imperial authorities know
better their country and they have a natural right to rule it.
Furthermore, Edward Said conveys his ideas and tells that we
always want for reputation and power and it may be the possible reason for the
thing that we are more and more by the western world and the impression is
shrinking and our perspectives towards our country has started shrinking in our
mind.
Furthermore Edward Said discusses the colonial effort of
European powers in the second half of the 19th century as it drew on
symbolic resources provided by the Orientalism to claim the national support
for the British and French imperial presence underdeveloped lands. Regarding
how the orient was supposed to be divided between the European powers.
Moreover, Edward Said explains that how the science of Orientalism
developed and how the Orientals started considering the Orientals as non-human beings.
The oriental divided the world in two parts by using the concert of ours and theirs.
An imaginary geographical line was drawn between what was ours and what was
theirs.
The orients were regarded as uncivilized people and the
westerns said that since they were the refined race and it was their duty to
civilize these people and in order to achieve their goal, they had to colonize
and rule the orientals.they said that the orients themselves were incapable of
running their own government.
The most important use of Orientalism to the Europeans was
that they defined themselves by defining the Orientals for example qualities
such as lazy, irrational, uncivilized, crudeness were related to Orientals and
automatically the Europeans became active, Rational, civilized and
sophisticated.
Thus in order to achieve this goal, it was necessary for the
Orientals to generalize the culture of the orientals.Another feature of Orientalism
was that the culture of the orient also was explained to the European audience
by linking them to western culture. For example Islam was made into mohammadism.the
because Mohammad was the founder of this religion.
Since religion of Christ was called Christianity thus Islam
should be called mohammadism.the point to be noted here is that no Muslim was
aware of this terminology and this was a completely term to which the Muslims
had no say at all.
In India, the Britishers were able to rule because of India
need to be like them.we, somewhere show them that they can rule but this
attitude changed our entire identity and up to some extent they succeeded in molding
our identity the way they wanted. The Britishers shown what they wanted but we
were spellbound by their identity and hidden intentions. So by establishing the
east India Company, they got the half victory and the remaining half was
achieved by them by expanding their British business.
To wind up:
At the end of this topic it can be said that here Edward Said
says about Orientalism because he wanted
to show the European-American power to the orient and the perspective of
western towards the east which has been well elaborated by Edward Said, who
concludes this chapter by saying that European should include the perspective
of Orient too.