Figurative Language
Introduction:
I.A Richards, Who’s
full name was Ivor Armstrong Richards, who was one of the most influential
figure among the critics of the 20th Century. He was born on February 26, 1893, Sandbank, Cheshire, England and also died on September 7, 1979, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, lived very long time and did
also very notable things in the history of English Criticism. He was an English
critic and poet. While a lecturer at Cambridge, Richards wrote influential
works, including Principles of Literary
Criticism (1924),
in which he introduced a new way of reading poetry that led to the New Criticism. A student of
psychology, he concluded that poetry performs a therapeutic function by
coordinating various human impulses into an aesthetic whole. In the 1930s he
spent much of his time developing Basic English, a language system of 850 basic
words that he believed would promote international understanding. He taught at
Harvard University from 1944.
He
took education at Cambridge. In fact, T.S. Eliot and I.A. Richards are
considered to be the pioneers in the field of New Criticism. They differ a lot
in the views. Critics like John Crowe Ronsom, Kenneth Brooke, cleanth Brooks,
R.P.Blackmur, and Robert Penn Warren William Empson were indebted to I.A.
Richards.
Richards
was educated at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and was a lecturer in English and
moral sciences there from 1922 to 1929. In that period he wrote three of his
most influential books: The Meaning
of meaning (1923) a pioneer work on
semantics and Principles of Literary Criticism (1924)
and Practical Criticism (1929),
companion volumes that he used to develop his critical method. The latter two
were based on experimental pedagogy: Richards would give students poems in
which the titles and authors’ names had been removed and then use their
responses for further development of their close reading skills. Richards is
best known for advancing the close reading of literature and for articulating the theoretical
principles upon which these skills lead to “practical criticism,” a method of
increasing readers’ analytic powers.
A
student of psychology and philosophy
along with literary forms, Richards concluded that poetry performs a
therapeutic function by coordinating a variety of human impulses into an
aesthetic whole, helping both the writer and the reader maintain their psychological
well-being. He valued poetry of inclusion that was able to contain the widest
variety of warring tensions and oppositions.
I.A
Richards is remembered today for his notable works as enlisted below
1. The Meaning of Meaning-
1923
2. The Practical of Criticism
– 1929
3. The Principles of Literary
criticism-1924
I.A.Richards differs from
the New Critics in one important respect, while the New Critics limit
themselves rigorously to the poem under consideration, I.A.Richards also take
into account its effect on the readers. For
him, the real value of a poem lies in the reaction and attitudes it creates
weather or not it is conductive to greater emotional balance equilibrium, peace
and rest in the mind of the readers. For him the value of a work of art lies in
its power to harmonies and organizes complex and warring human impulses into
patterns that are lasting and pleasurable.
In his work I.A. Richards discusses
about the figurative language as well as metaphorical language, who was an
orthodox advocate of a close textual and verbal study and analysis of work of
verbal study and analysis of work of art. According to Richards there are three
objectives to write The Practical criticism.
Four kinds of meanings:
According to him the poet
writes to communicate, and language is the means of that Communication Language
is made of words and therefore it is a study of words is all important if the
meaning of work of art is understood. Words carry four kind of meaning sense,
Feelings Tone and intention, which are enlisted below
Ø Sense
Ø Feelings
Ø Tone
Ø Intention etc.
Let’s
discuss these four kinds of meanings in detail.
Sense:
Sense is very much important
in the any work of art or literature. Here Sense deals with the simple as well
as plain meanings of any literary work according to I.A Richards. Because Sense
is an integral element of the poetry due to it one can understand the entire meaning
of the poem. By sense it meant something that is
communicated by the plain literal meanings of the words. About Sense one scholar
comments
“In
most poetry the sense is as important as anything else;
It
is quite as a subtle, and as dependent of the syntax as in
Prose;
it is the poet’s chief instrument to other aims when it is not
Itself
his aim. His control of our thoughts is ordinarily his chief means to the
Control
of our feeling, and in the immense majority of instances we miss nearly
everything"
Feelings:
Feelings
are very much necessary for the poet and for the reader also because one is
able to grasp the meaning but if he cannot understand the feelings of the poet
or what the poet wants to convey his or her ideas through words then the poet
fails in the field of poetry. Feeling Refers to emotional attitudes desire,
will, pleasure, unpleasure and the rest words express feelings.
Tone:
As
far as Tone is concerned, it is equally required in the poetry that tone should
be there in any literary work. Tone deals with the tone of the poet because
sometimes it is possible that tone helps us to understand the meanings of the
poem. Tone here means the writers
attitude towards his audience. The writer chooses his words and arranges them
keeping in mind the taste of his readers. Feeling is only state of mind.
Intention:
Intention
deals with the purpose of the poet. Due to Intention reader sometimes cannot or
fails to grasp the meaning of the poetry. Many times it is observed that what
the poet wants to say one cannot understand the entire poetry. Intention is
authors conscious or unconscious aim, it is the effect that one tries to produce.
Also intention controls the emphasis, shapes the arrangement, or draws
attention to something of importance.
After
discussing four kinds of meanings then I.A Richards proceeds further to convey
his idea about Importance of Rhyme and Rhythm.I.A. Richards by his own
work could make literary Criticism factual, Scientific and complete. It no
longer remains a matter of the application of set ruler or mere ‘intiution’ or
impressions analysis, interpretation and evaluation have exercised considerable
influence on the New Critics everywhere.Words in poetry have an emotive value, and the
figurative language used by poets conveys those emotions effectively and
forcefully. Words have different meaning in different contexts. Words are
symbols or signs and they deliver their full meaning only in a particular
context. Sense and feeling have a mutual dependence.
Significance of Rhyme and
Rhythm:
Rhythm
and Metre are organic and integral and important parts of any integral and
important parts of any poem because they determine the meaning of the words
used by the poets Rhythm, meter and meaning cannot be separated they from
together a single system. Rhythm and its specialized form, meter, depend upon repetition and expectancy. Equally where what is
expected recurs and where it fails, all rhythmical and metrical effects spring
from anticipation.
The Nature of poetic Truth:
Metaphorical
language is important purpose of communication. The Nature of poetic Truth is
very much important but it differs from the scientific truth.“It is evident that the bulk of poetry consists of
statements which only the very foolish would think of attempting to verify.
They are not the kind of things which can be verified. It we recall what was
said in chapter 16 as to the natural generality of vagueness of reference we
shall see another reason why references as they occur in poetry are rarely
susceptible to scientific truth or falsity. Only references which are brought
into certain highly complex and very special combinations so as to correspond
to the ways in which things actually hang together, can be either true or false
and most references in poetry are not knit together in this way.
Source of Misunderstanding
in Poetry:
In
practical criticism a study of literary judgment, I.A.Richards has given the
theory of Figurative language. He starts discussion first on sources of
misunderstanding in poetry. He says that it is very difficult to find the
source which creates misunderstanding. Further, he says that there are four
sources of misunderstanding as far as are poetry is concerned. According to I.A. Richards there are four sources of
misunderstanding of poetry. It is difficult to diagnose with accuracy and
definiteness, the source of some particular mistake or misunderstanding of the
sense of poetry. It arises from inattention, or sheer carelessness.
I.A. Richards warns readers –In most poetry
the sense is as important as anything else it is quite as a subtle, and
as dependent on the syntax, as in prose it is the poet’s chief instrument to
other aims when it is not itself his aim. An over literal-reading is as
great a source of misunderstanding. Careless intuitive reading and prosaic
‘over-literal reading are the simple-godes the justing rocks. Defective
scholarship is a third source of misunderstanding in poetry.
The
reader may fail to understand the sense of the poet because he is ignorant of
poet’s sense. Afar more serious cause of misunderstanding is the failure to
realise that the poetic use of words is different from an assumption about
language that can be fatal to poetry. Literary is one serious obstacle in the
way of a right understanding of the poetic words. According to Richards-poetry
is different from prose and needs a different attitude for right understanding.
If
we talk about another misunderstanding of the sense of poetry, we can say that
some poets often themselves like to play all manners of tricks with their
sense. Sometimes a poet dissolves the coherence of his sense altogether, and
may seem chaotic and incoherent. The ordinary laws of syntax and grammar may be
thrown to the window. These chaotic and in incoherent structure arise the
complex situation in the poetry. Reader feels uncertainty to solve it. As a
result, a reader fails to understand the concept of the poetry and feel
complicated situation.
Mixed Metaphors:
Mixed Metaphors:
The Value of Figurative
Language:
Sometimes it is possible that figurative
language may create some misunderstanding in any literary work. Therefore it is
necessary to identify the figures of speech. It is difficult to turn
poetry into logical respectable prose. Is combining with recognition of the
liberties which are proper for a poet, and the power and value of figurative
language. There are various comments
on the above piece of the hyperbole of the sea-harp. The only concrete simile
in the octave is the likening of the sea to a harp- surely a little
extravagant.
There is no doubt that the similarity between
the sound of a harp and the sea but in poetry such things do happen. It is
clear that the effect proposed by the poet is, an exhilarating awakening of
wonder and a fusion of the sea,lightning and spring, those three most moving
manifestations of Nature
The poet is rather negligent in the
choice of means he has employed to attain his end. The enjoyment and understanding
of the best poetry require s sensitiveness and discrimination with words a
nicety, imaginativeness and deftness in taking their sense which will prevent
the poem in question, in its original form, from attentive readers.
The Value of Personification:
Personification
is the best way to express the idea of poet.Bacause personification adds more colours
into the language of poetry. Sometimes it looks like very ornamental language. Personification comes
naturally to us. Personification may not express sense but it expresses the
feelings of the poet towards what he is speaking about. Personification enables
the poet to clear and comprehend the difficult work.
Now about value of Personification I.A Richards comments
Now about value of Personification I.A Richards comments
“There are indeed very good reasons why poetry should
personify. The structure of language and the pronouns, verbs and adjectives
that come most naturally to us constantly invite us to personify. And to go
deeper, our attitudes, feelings, and ways of thought about inanimate things are
moulded upon and grow out of our whys of thinking and feeling about one
another. Our minds have developed with other human beings always in the
foreground of our consciousness we are shape, mentally, by and through our
dealings with other people. It is so in the history of the race and in the individual
biography. No wonder that if what we have to say about inanimate from only
appropriate’ if strict sense is our sole consideration, to persons and human
relations.”
The importance of visual memory:
Visual memory is very
much necessary in any literary work according to I.A Richards. For a proper appreciation
and evaluation of the imagery of a poem, visual memory is also an essential,
and its lake misleads the critic and distorts his judgment. The use of the word
pencil, meaning, produce the effect of pencilling – is highly suggestive in the
poem. its suggestion, “both of the hard, clear outline of the clouds edge and
of the shadowy variation in the lighting of its inner recess , is not in the
least cancelled by climbed or by the sky scraper hoist of miraculous stocked
.
Miraculous
stocked seems at least to have clear advantage over ‘the tremendous triumph of
tall towers’ in point of economy and vividness. ‘Puzzle’, has accuracy also on
its side against these cavilers. Anyone who watches the rest less shifted of
cattle as the shadow suddenly darkness there, would for them will endowers the
poet’s observations. But if the cows never noticed any change of light the word
would still be justified through its evocative effect upon men. Similarly with
paint and ghost; they work as a rapid and fresh notation of not vary unfamiliar
effect.
Conclusion:
A
few words more, we can say that according to I.A Richards a proper
understanding of figurative language required close study of the poem. Reader
should read the poem into the context of close reading. its literal since must
be carefully followed, but such literal reading must not come in the way of imagination appreciation of it
judicious balance must be struck between literalism and imaginative freedom.